Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Greatest Story Never Told Chapter 2: Bread And Circuses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Greatest Story Never Told Chapter 2: Bread And Circuses

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album suffering from WP:TOOSOON, not even released yet. Article serves as WP:ADVERT without WP:RS to satisfy WP:NMUSIC. Article was created by a WP:SPA with no other edits; thus, possible WP:COI. Qworty (talk) 03:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible keep:I'm not sure whether this will satisfy the requirements, but there is some new coverage for this album, and a tracklist has been released. HipHopDX, XXL, and The Source have all covered this album. I'm not sure if Rapzilla is okay also. I was the one who submitted the tip, but it had nothing to do with trying to get this album on Wikipedia. The bigger issue with that one is it is just a summary of The Source article. But the first three should be good.--¿3family6 _contribs 02:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now - As a result of the first three references that 3family6 provided, I'm inclined to keeping this article for now. Considering that the release date is a month away, the album may receive additional coverage as time goes. There are far worse articles and we should keep to mind that most hip hop albums won't receive the usual and best coverage. SwisterTwister talk 01:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - More information on the album will be put in to place, if the article still isn't up to good standards after the album is released then it should be considered for deletion. JoyRider (talk) 10:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.